Insight
MEDITECH Licensed vs. MaaS: What’s Best for Your Healthcare Organization?
How To Select the Right MEDITECH Expanse Platform
Moving to a new electronic health record (EHR) is one of the most complex and high-stakes decisions a healthcare organization can make. From early planning through implementation and long-term optimization, each choice shapes not only IT operations but also clinical workflows, financial performance, and future scalability.
For organizations considering MEDITECH Expanse, one of the first and most important decisions is whether to pursue a traditional licensed implementation or MEDITECH’s cloud-based subscription model, MEDITECH as a Service (MaaS).
Both approaches offer distinct advantages. The right path depends on your organization’s financial strategy, internal IT capabilities, implementation timeline, and long-term vision for innovation, growth, and system management.
Understanding the Difference: MEDITECH Licensed vs. MaaS
MEDITECH’s Licensed model represents a traditional EHR deployment approach, where the organization owns and manages its environment. This model provides flexibility in hosting, allowing systems to deploy MEDITECH Expanse on-premises, in a private or public cloud, or through a hybrid approach. It also allows for more control over how and when functionality is implemented.
MEDITECH as a Service (MaaS), by contrast, is a fully managed, cloud-hosted model delivered through Google Cloud Platform (GCP). In this model, MEDITECH manages infrastructure, updates, and core system components. Organizations typically go live with a standardized version of Expanse with less responsibility for ongoing system maintenance.
As healthcare organizations accelerate cloud adoption, selecting the right model is increasingly important. While both deployment models offer the opportunity to free up internal resources for more strategic initiatives, they differ in flexibility, customization, support considerations, and long-term value realization.
Licensed vs. MaaS: Planning Considerations
Cost and Financial Strategy
What to consider: Are lower upfront costs a priority, or does long-term cost control better align with your financial and capital planning strategy?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| Upfront investment includes licensing fees. Total cost of ownership can be optimized through managed hosting and cloud strategies, offering both cost control and predictability. | With a subscription-based pricing model, recurring fees can aid in planning, though long-term costs depend on usage, storage, and additional services. |
Healthcare organizations are increasingly evaluating EHR investments through a return-on-investment lens, weighing tradeoffs between long-term cost control, flexibility, and how capital is allocated across broader strategic priorities.
Customization and Flexibility
What to consider: Will your organization require tailored workflows, phased implementation, or integration with third-party applications?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| Offers flexibility to customize workflows, deploy modules incrementally, and integrate third-party applications to support complex operational needs or unique clinical workflows. | Provides a standardized deployment model with limited customization. MEDITECH manages core applications and dictionaries. |
Hosting and Infrastructure Strategy
What to consider: Does your organization's IT strategy lean toward customization and control?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| Supports on-premises, public cloud (such as AWS or Azure), private cloud, or hybrid hosting models. This flexibility allows organizations to align infrastructure decisions with broader IT strategy. | Fully managed hosting within MEDITECH’s cloud environment. Infrastructure, performance, and availability are managed by MEDITECH. |
Licensed vs. MaaS: Implementation Considerations
Implementation Timeline and Speed to Value
What to consider: Is speed to deployment a primary driver, or is a phased and highly customized implementation more important?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| Implementation timing offers flexibility in planning, build, testing, and go-live sequencing for more tailored system configuration. | Offers a standardized deployment timeline that can simplify planning. Speed to value depends on governance, readiness, and resources. |
Training, Adoption, and Change Management
What to consider: How will you design, deliver, and sustain end-user training?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| Organizations using licensed models can deploy internal training or choose a partner with platform-specific experience for customized end-user education. | MEDITECH provides structured training support based on applications and user volumes, helping reduce the burden on internal teams. |
Innovation and Scalability
What to consider: How will your organization support growth, evolving care models, and new technologies such as analytics and AI?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| Licensed environments enable custom innovation and support best-of-breed integrations with greater control and customization. | Designed to accommodate increasing patient volumes and data with a standardized environment and a routine schedule for updates. |
Licensed vs. MaaS: Support Considerations
System Performance, Updates, and Control
What to consider: How important is control over system updates and upgrade timing?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| Provides full control over update timing and configuration. This is particularly valuable for organizations with highly customized workflows that require testing before changes are introduced. | Updates are managed and deployed by MEDITECH across MaaS environments. This ensures consistency, but requires alignment with MEDITECH’s update schedule. |
IT Resourcing and Operational Support
What to consider: Does your organization have the staffing and expertise required to support and maintain the system over time?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| Firms using licensed models often partner with experienced firms to extend IT capabilities, optimize performance, and reduce internal burden without sacrificing control. | Transfers much of the operational burden to MEDITECH, potentially reducing internal IT demands but offering less flexibility than partner-supported models. |
Post-Go-Live Support
What to consider: How do you plan to address managed services, application support, and coding support?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| MEDITECH provides software support, while organizations can rely on experienced partners for Tier 1-3 support and operational processes. | MEDITECH provides infrastructure and system support, while organizations retain responsibility for certain application-level and operational functions. |
Security and Compliance
What to consider: How will you manage security, compliance, and risk mitigation?
| Licensed | MaaS |
| Organizations can partner with experienced firms to develop a flexible approach to security, monitoring, and compliance. | Relies on MEDITECH for compliance with built-in disaster recovery and vendor-managed security practices. |
Which Option Is Right for You?
Both Licensed and MaaS models offer meaningful advantages, and the right choice depends on your organization’s priorities. For organizations seeking flexibility, control, and a tailored approach to infrastructure and support, licensed models remain a strong and strategic choice.
Ultimately, the decision comes down to how your organization balances control, speed, cost, and internal capabilities. Tegria works with healthcare organizations to evaluate these tradeoffs and align MEDITECH Expanse strategy with broader operational and technology goals. By taking a structured approach to this decision, organizations can ensure their EHR investment supports both immediate needs and long-term success.
Get in Touch With an Expert

Chad Skidmore

Rob Hoehne